Compare · sources read 2026-10-06

Decodo alternative: ProxyLabs and Decodo compared

The vendor formerly known as Smartproxy, with two product categories and a self-serve checkout. This page sets out what each side publishes, quotes Decodo where it is described, and says where Decodo is ahead.

  1. Vendor page
  2. Quoted wordsWith the URL
  3. Date read
  4. Side by side
Read this first. Statements about Decodo come from its own public pages, read on 2026-10-06, and are numbered to the sources below. Pool sizes are the vendor's claims, not measurements. Pages change; check the link. Prices are not compared: they change often, and the price that matters is cost per success, which you can work out with the cost tool.
ProxyLabs compared with Decodo
TopicProxyLabsDecodo
Pool size, as claimedNo pool size published. Coverage is confirmed per country in the dashboard before purchase. DetailsClaims 115M+ real-user IPs across 195+ locations. [1]
Trial and refund termsEvaluation terms are agreed per account. No trial or refund window is published yet. DetailsOffers a 3-day free trial of 100 MB, after which the chosen plan activates automatically. A 14-day money-back option does not apply with the trial. [2]
ProtocolsHTTP, HTTPS and SOCKS5 where your plan lists them. DetailsHTTP(S) and SOCKS5. [3]
TargetingCountry, with finer targeting where the dashboard lists it. Differs by product. DetailsLists continent, country, state, city, ZIP code and ASN targeting. [4]
Customer vettingSign-up asks who you are and what you will collect. Some products and larger accounts need further verification. DetailsNot stated on the page read.
Certification claimsNone claimed. No audit or certification report exists to hand over. DetailsNot stated on the page read.

Decodo may suit you better if

  • You want to start the same day with a published trial and refund window, which ProxyLabs does not publish yet.
  • You want broad targeting options stated on the page and a straightforward self-serve plan ladder.
  • Your priority is a short path from sign-up to a first request.

ProxyLabs may suit you better if

  • You want the definition of each metric published before any result is quoted. See the method.
  • You want each product page to say what it is not for.
  • You want to ask engineering questions and get an engineer. See contact.
  • You need the gaps stated: no certification, no published trial window, no published pool size. See trust.

Questions to put to Decodo in writing

  • Where is the consent and compensation process for the residential pool documented?
  • Is the 100 MB trial allowance measured on request bytes, response bytes, or both, and what happens to unused allowance?
  • Which of the listed targeting options apply on each plan, and which are limited?

Worth weighing about Decodo

  • No customer-vetting statement was found on the page read. If your reviewers need one, ask the vendor in writing.

Sources

  1. Pool size, as claimed, read 2026-10-06.
    "Access 115M+ real-user IPs across 195+ locations"
    https://decodo.com/proxies/residential-proxies/pricing
  2. Trial and refund terms, read 2026-10-06.
    "Enjoy 100 MB for 3 days, and after the trial period ends, your chosen plan will activate automatically" and "a 14-day money-back option doesn’t apply with a 3-day free trial."
    https://decodo.com/proxies/residential-proxies/pricing
  3. Protocols, read 2026-10-06.
    "HTTP(S) & SOCKS5 support"
    https://decodo.com/proxies/residential-proxies/pricing
  4. Targeting, read 2026-10-06.
    "Continent, country, state, city, ZIP code, and ASN-level targeting"
    https://decodo.com/proxies/residential-proxies/pricing

Run both on your own targets.

The comparison that settles it is the one on your workload. Follow the published protocol and read the numbers before you commit.